Sex Bias Versus Sexual Harassment Probed in CVS Arbitration Case

Sex Bias Versus Sexual Harassment Probed in CVS Arbitration Case

SEO Content Writing Service

CVS, one of its former store managers, the EEOC, and employer-rights advocates were questioned Wednesday by the Third Circuit about what the type of mistreatment must be alleged to meet a #MeToo-spurred law’s requirements for opting out of an employment arbitration agreement.

At issue in Michele Cornelius’ appeal of a US District Court for the District of New Jersey decision sending her suit against CVS Pharmacy Inc., its New Jersey unit and her ex-supervisor to arbitration is whether she can invoke the 2022 Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Act. The lower court found Cornelius pleaded …



Source link

You May Also Like

About the Author: digitalinfocenter

Home Privacy Policy Terms Of Use Anti Spam Policy Contact Us Affiliate Disclosure Amazon Affiliate Disclaimer DMCA Earnings Disclaimer